
Might the solution to humanity’s oldest query are we alone be trapped within a blue-green speck no larger than a grain of sand?
Among the ancient sediments of Jezero Crater’s Neretva Vallis, NASA’s Perseverance rover has discovered mudstones speckled with bright “poppy seeds” and circled “leopard spots.” These aren’t Martian geological curiosities. Described in a new “Nature” report, the formations are abundant in two minerals vivianite, an iron phosphate, and greigite, an iron sulfide that, on our planet, tend to be created by microbial metabolisms in low-temperature aquatic settings.

1. The Unusual Mineralogy of the Bright Angel Formation
The finding is from an outcrop known as the Bright Angel formation, where Perseverance’s science instruments SHERLOC’s deep-UV Raman spectroscopy and PIXL’s micro–X-ray fluorescence measured the chemistry of the speckles at sub-millimeter scales. The vivianite nodules, 100–200 microns in diameter, are rich in Fe and P, and the rims of the leopard spots have this composition. Their centers, however, consist of Fe–S phases consistent with greigite, along with higher zinc and nickel. On Earth, such mineral associations are often the result of sequential microbial iron and sulfate reduction, reactions that release Fe²⁺ and sulfide ions which subsequently precipitate as these minerals.

2. Organic Matter and Possible Biosignatures
SHERLOC also saw strong Raman G band at around 1,600 cm⁻¹ in the same rocks spectroscopic proof of aromatic carbon compounds. These organics may be the residue of past biomass or prebiotic chemistry. The sample has what we think is a possible biosignature,” study lead author Joel Hurowitz said. “I don’t think we can say that about any of the other samples that we brought back.” Co-occurrence of the organics with vivianite and greigite supports biological activity, but abiotic processes are still possible.

3. Geological Context Supports Habitability
Jezero Crater was previously a lake basin supplied by river channels. The Bright Angel mudstones probably were created when fine sediments settled in quiet, oxygen-deficient waters. PIXL data reveal no high-temperature alteration evidence, eliminating heat-powered mineral production that might simulate biosignatures. Instead, the textures are similar to terrestrial “reduction halos” and “reduction spots” found in microbial diagenesis of sediments.

4. The Null Hypothesis: Abiotic Chemistry
The scientists tried non-biological explanations. Abiotic Fe³⁺ reduction by organic compounds, or lifeless sulfate reduction, is possible but usually at elevated temperatures or with slow kinetics under Martian-like conditions. There was no indication of hydrothermal systems present in the vicinity, and burial depths adequate to warm the rocks above 150°C are not probable for the Noachian-aged sediments. Nevertheless, Hurowitz warned: “We must be conservative and hold to the potential biosignature designation until other studies… can be conducted on Earth.”

5. Why Earth Labs Are Necessary
Verifying life’s signature involves analysis beyond the capability of rovers nano-scale isotopic mapping, compound-specific carbon isotope ratios, and crystallography. These need the controlled environments and high-resolution equipment of Earth-based laboratories. As University of Chicago scientist Nicolas Dauphas said, “Only [a] Mars sample return can answer the billion-dollar question: ‘Was there ever life on Mars?'”

6. Mars Sample Return Under Threat
That ultimate test rides on the Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission, a collaborative NASA–ESA project to extract Perseverance’s sealed cores, including the “Sapphire Canyon” sample from Cheyava Falls. But MSR is under existential threat: the Trump administration’s fiscal 2026 budget proposal zeros its funding, attributing cost overruns. Standalone analysis has estimated a trimmed-down mission at $8 billion with a return in 2035, but without congressional action, decades of planning may go down the drain.

7. Engineering the First Interplanetary Round Trip
MSR’s design is a technological achievement in and of itself. The proposal would have a lander retrieve cached tubes, a Mars Ascent Vehicle launch them into orbit, and ESA’s Earth Return Orbiter retrieve and deliver them back home. This would be the inaugural rocket launch from another world a precision dance of free-flying robots, orbital rendezvous, and planetary protection measures to avoid forward and backward contamination. Other concepts being explored include exploiting heritage “sky crane” systems or commercial sector breakthroughs to reduce cost and schedule.

8. Planetary Protection and Contamination Risks
The implications go beyond science. As recent survival experiments in biofilms demonstrate, microbial life from the cleanrooms of spacecraft assembly facilities can survive Mars-like salty conditions. Any human retrieval mission must protect against contamination of unblemished Martian samples, compromising detection of biosignatures. This is the reason that most experts call for a complete robot return for the initial cache.

9. Global Competition in Sample Return
China unveiled plans for a more straightforward “grab-and-go” Mars sample mission by 2030. Although such a mission would not have the edited-for-diversity cache of MSR’s collection, it could say first returned Martian material a symbolic and strategic victory. “Even if it is just a ‘grab’ sample, [China] can rightfully say [it] beat NASA and the U.S.,” warned NASA’s first “Mars Czar” Scott Hubbard.
The speckled mudstones of the Bright Angel formation are more than a rock curiosity; they are a crossroads for planetary exploration. Without a way to return them home, the alluring prospect that they document ancient Martian life remains just that an intriguing possibility suspended in the thin, chilly air of Jezero Crater.